Oasis of the Seas - A Vision of All Consuming Hell

The San Francisco Chronicle is a great newspaper.  Like the L.A. Times, it has an endless staff of intellectually curious, bright journalists instilled with an ethic of investigative journalism of the likes Miami Herald - Cruise Line Fanof super-journalist Douglas Franz.  All qualities which our newspapers here in South Florida are  sorely missing.

Miami Herald - An Enabler of the "Greed of the Seas" 

I have commented before on how the Miami Herald is basically the cruise line's bitch, if you excuse my French.  

Which brings me to today's blog.  The Miami Herald is attending a press frenzy today in Port Everglades on Royal Caribbean's mega-monster Oasis of the Seas. Tomorrow, the increasingly few Miami residents who subscribe to the Miami Herald can expect the usual puff piece with its usual "wow! look-at-how-big-it-is" stories. 

Where are the free thinkers questioning the madness of this monster?  The "journalists" surrounding this beast of a ship more resemble groupies thronging for attention around a 1980's metal band.  

So I felt redeemed today when I read a column from talented journalist Mark Moford of the San Francisco Chronicle about Royal Caribbean's monster of the seas.  I have attempted a couple of similar insights such as Royal Caribbean's "Monster of the Seas" - a Cruise Ship Only Gordon Gekko Could Love but my article falls well short of Mr. Moford's straight-to-the-jugular writing. 

Oasis of the Seas - Monster of the SeasHis feelings today about monster cruise ships are so spot on that I will just repeat them verbatim:

Mark Moford and Dante's Inferno

"If you're anything like me, you can't help but be completely overwhelmed by one devastating, all-encompassing thought whenever you see any of those insane floating nightmares known as monster cruise ships.

You think of sewage. 

Right? Don't you? It's all I can do not to imagine the mountains of waste these ungodly leviathans produce on your average oceanic journey: The heaps of garbage, sewage, toilet paper, plastic, chemicals and leftover food from the gluttonous buffets, all that clammy shrimp, rotting lettuce and industrial prime rib uneaten by 6,000 largely unhealthy people agreeing to be trapped aboard a floating ring of Dante's inferno for two solid weeks.

A Terrifically Ugly Floating Vomitorium

I fully believe cruise ships are one of man's most nefarious inventions, an extremely sad, low-vibrating form of evil, cleverly disguised as desirable luxury but which, if you spend more than a few hours wandering the decks by yourself, will subtly and calmly urge you to jump overboard and end it all. Which is exactly why they're all based in Florida.

Mark MofordHence, it was utterly impossible for me to stifle a bone-deep shudder when fresh images of the world's largest cruise ship, the Oasis of the Seas, upwards of 225,000 gross tons and several times larger than the Titanic, recently lumbered across my jaded retina. This nefarious colossus is not merely terrifically ugly, not merely a bizarre testament to man's voracious desire to build the absolutely silliest, most ginormous things he can possibly imagine, not merely greed and PR and unchecked capitalism run amok. Oh wait, that's exactly what it is. And I'm not afraid to admit: It frightens me deeply.

I suppose the good news is, whenever tacky cruise ships make the news - usually because of a nasty flu outbreak on board that turns the entire vessel into a floating vomitorium - I'm wont to recall the late David Foster Wallace's pitch-perfect, all-time classic piece from Harper's (PDF here) years back that set the standard for brilliant literary takedowns. Far as I'm concerned, anything that re-ignites an appreciation for DFW can't be all bad."

 

Credits:

Miami Herald's Business Monday   Miami Herald

Oasis of the Seas    Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., a Liberian Corporation

Mark Moford   SFGate / San Francisco Chronicle 

 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.cruiselawnews.com/admin/trackback/167925
Comments (4) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Greg (CruiseInd) - November 20, 2009 9:58 PM

Two things to look at:
1) I would go even broader then just sewage. We all know ships dump. They make it seem like they fully contain everything, but the ugly truth is that outside the 3 mile boundary ships can pretty do what they want (outside of opa90 and marpol.) So not just an astronomical amount of sewage, but also an astronomical amount of bilge and what every else is down in the deep parts of the ship.
2) I would also raise concern over the life boat. RCI or STX or whoever was in charge of that department had to lobby SOLAS to get an exemption to have the 300+ capacity lifeboats. Until now 150 was the LAW. Now its double the capacity. Its a completely new design that has never been tested on a ship before.
Just my thoughts,
Greg

j-man - June 11, 2010 12:09 PM

looks like shit

tom peck - August 1, 2010 9:00 PM

Best cruise I have ever experienced.

Toniann - March 5, 2012 1:05 PM

The bigger they are, the harder they fall.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.